Genuine ecotourism in West Papua
The term 'ecotourism' still covers many overtones, and in the absence of an independent national certification scheme in Indonesia, just about anybody presently can claim to be operating an environmentally and socially responsible travel operation in West Papua. To too many, ecotourism is merely synonymous with 'nature travel', which more often than not entails significant negative environmental and social impacts. Yet to a growing number, ecotourism is a deeply social and entrepreneurial approach to achieving long-term biodiversity conservation as well as sustainable community development goals. Naturally, we adhere to the latter social movement while also wishing to emphasize that — however much genuine ecotourism endeavors to create social and ecological benefits — it nonetheless is a commercial activity that can only be conducted through sound business practices.
Ecotourism and indigenous peoples
At Papua Expeditions we firmly do believe that carefully planned and implemented ecotourism may contribute significantly to both the conservation of natural habitats and the well-being of indigenous peoples. We recognize as our duty to ensure that indigenous communities do benefit, to the maximum extent possible, from deployment of our ecotourism activities if these are to stand any chance of genuinely rivaling the increasing claims to deleterious resource extraction throughout West Papua. After all, people who earn a living directly through responsible travel, are more amenable to actively help protecting the environment on which their livelihood depends. Indigenous peoples, still intrinsically connected to the natural world around them, often possess an uncanny intimacy with the specialty component of biodiversity that allures overseas visitors. Their services as guides, porters and cooks add quintessential couleur locale to your Papua experience and are quite simply indispensable to the successful operation of a trip.
In engaging indigenous peoples in ecotourism activities, Papua Expeditions has always embraced a rights-based approach, respectful of the principles set forth in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (DRIP) and, more generally, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). We principally adhere to customary land rights (called hak ulayat in Indonesian) and always endeavor to strengthen and revitalize customary land tenure systems, which until recently broadly sustained biodiversity at the landscape level throughout West Papua. By linking up the financial benefits of ecotourism with the continuous presence and protection of local wildlife through wise land tenure, we instigate and nurture pride in customary landownership and bring a strong conservation message. For all these reasons, we reserve the right to make any financial compensation for deploying non-invasive ecotourism activities on ancestral lands conditional upon active participation in habitat protection of requesting village authorities and landowners.
We exclusively employ indigenous people entitled to ancestral land rights and/or actually residing at the respective sites that we visit. Because we conclude all ground arrangements with indigenous communities directly ourselves — hence effectively eliminating third party agents outside our control — and by consistently applying a competitive salary scheme, Papua Expeditions guarantees fair remuneration of the services indigenous people provide. By handling trips in close collaboration and continuous consultation with the people belonging to the places that we visit, we are able to both increase their economical benefit e.g. in the form of local purchase of food surplus, as effectively reduce our impact on traditional societies. We are keen on training and assisting indigenous people to stream through in our organization or to develop their own derivative businesses in conjunction with our business expansion strategy.
100 % Locally-owned
Papua Expeditions is 100 % locally-owned by an Indonesian family of mixed Papuan, North Moluccan and ethnic Chinese origin, with traceable ancestry and residence in the Sorong area of West Papua since the end of the nineteenth century, and rooted within the royal houses of the former kingdoms of Salawati in the Raja Ampat archipelago off Sorong and Bacan in the northern Moluccas.
On Waigeo Island in the fabled Raja Ampat archipelago off New Guinea's western tip, Papua Expeditions entered into an ambitious and innovative five-year pilot agreement with customary landowners in a bid to preserve for future generations, the entire Orobiai River catchment there: 92 sq km of virtually untouched primary forest, set in visually stunning topography, and teeming with spectacular yet globally threatened wildlife. Our Community Conservation and Ecotourism Agreement (CCEA) seals direct structured payments by Papua Expeditions to customary landholding groups on Waigeo in return for carefully defined and monitored conservation and education outcomes. We act on the convincingness of the added value of at least attempting to make conservation efforts more market-driven.
Sound business practices
The 2007 Oslo Statement on Ecotourism calls for sound business practices in the sector and recognizes that the business of ecotourism can be as fragile and sensitive as the environments in which it occurs, especially since many ecotourism products are provided by micro or small enterprises like ours. The foresight and investment of private ecotourism entrepreneurs is essential to achieving conservation goals through ecotourism, in partnership with protected area managers and indigenous communities. In Indonesia, however, a special breed of ecotourism outfits persists in the form of charitable foundations (called yayasan in Indonesian) that compete directly with the private sector by providing the same commercial ecotourism services as tour organization, guiding and lodging. Such so-called non-profit organizations are usually purposefully established and run by opportunistic business people, who generally have very little to say about ecotourism, biodiversity or conservation, work with little transparency, recruit clients in the name of conservation and community development, and often even collect operational funds from foreign donors in order to offset costs for their corporate responsibility. Their business as veiled travel operators can usually readily be shown to constitute their core activity. Yet direct trading by a not-for-profit foundation is manifestly illegal in Indonesia since the enactment of Law No. 16 of 2001 regarding 'Foundations'. Moreover, the misuse of tax exemptions enables these alleged charities to provide services well below economically viable market-fares, and this in turn undermines the genuine efforts of both community-owned enterprises as the corporate ecotourism world. We urge potential visitors to West Papua to bear all this in mind when assessing and comparing travel operations.
Throughout Indonesia, adherence to the principles of conservation, environmental care and sustainability still is in its infancy. In the sheer absence of modern waste processing infrastructure in the territory, Papua Expeditions rigorously enforces its policy of garbage-prevention, whether in the office or out in the field. We operate an office as paperless as possibly can be and principally oppose printed materials for advertising purposes. In the field we see to it that biodegradable detergents and toiletries are being used at all times and that any non-combustible residual packaging of foodstuffs is being carried out back to town and properly disposed of. 'Goes without saying': we hear you shouting. Yet virtually all travel outfits visiting West Papua just continue to dump trash on site till this day, thereby creating significant waste problems for indigenous communities in the long term. Last but not least, we absolutely forbid the collection of any specimens on any of our trips, and always strive to reduce disturbance of the bird- and wildlife that we take our guests and friends to see.
Reducing our carbon footprint
We have always felt that long-haul air travel is the foremost field in which to achieve a significant reduction of greenhouse gas emissions within the scope of our operations. Rather than to resort to controversial and distracting carbon-offsetting, we adopted a proactive strategy in reorienting our business toward increasingly affluent and receptive regional markets. As a direct result, we are pleased to be able to say that, since 2011, up to 67 % of our yearly guests are resident within the Australasian realm, whereas in the early days of our operations all our guests, without exception, were inter-continental travelers from Europe and the USA.
Preventing deforestation and forest degradation are also obvious ways of reducing the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. 'Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries and approaches to stimulate action', first appeared as an agenda item in December 2005, at the 11th session of the Conference of the Parties to the Climate Change Convention (COP 11) in Montréal. Two years later, at COP 13 in Bali, Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation, commonly referred to as REDD, was the big new idea to save the planet from runaway climate change. Eight years later, the world's politicians are still talking about the framework, mechanisms and modalities of an enhanced REDD+ in which the rights of indigenous peoples — initially simply skipped over — are just starting to be acknowledged in principle. All this time, however, this increasingly controversial top-down initiative did not yield a single rupiah-cent for a customary landowner in West Papua as a reward for good forest stewardship, and the territory's vast frontier forests continue to be depleted at an unprecedented scale.
At Papua Expeditions, we certainly didn't want to wait for the world's leaders to get it right. It simply takes too long and carbon-offsetting anyway is a misleading solution to our climate problems. With our Community Conservation and Ecotourism Agreement (CCEA) for the Orobiai River catchment on the Raja Ampat island of Waigeo, we sought to start at the very bottom, where it matters most, by engaging into direct structured payments to customary landholding groups in return for carefully defined and monitored conservation and education outcomes. Our initiative is inspired on the concept of Payment for Ecological Services (PES), whereby a voluntary, contingent transaction is made between buyers and providers of a well-defined environmental service or a land-use likely to produce that service. While most definitely not conceived with climate change mitigation in mind, by avoiding deforestation and forest degradation, our initiative may reasonably be expected to yield climate benefits in addition to the tangible benefits to indigenous communities and the environment on which their livelihoods depend. In short, when you travel with us in West Papua, your visit really counts for indigenous peoples, forests and wildlife.
Finally, it goes without saying that we also spare no reasonable effort to actively reduce our carbon footprint within our day-to-day operations. We use public transport whenever this is feasible, and when a charter is required, we always ensure that efficiently-powered vehicles are being used. We fly as least as possible for general company operational purposes, and readily will undertake alternative journeys of up to 48 hrs by shipping carrier if available.
Read on about our Community Conservation and Ecotourism Agreement for the Orobiai River catchment on Waigeo Island.
Read on about Ecotourism in Papua (from Ecoclub.com).
Read on about the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (from www.undesadspd.org).
Read on about carbon trading (from www.fern.org) to know how it works and why it is controversial.
Read on about Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (from noredd.makenoise.org) to know how it works and why it is controversial.
in West Papua are rapidly
being overtaken by the 21st
century. Ever increasing cash-dependency
and the decay of customary
land tenure systems incite indigenous
communities to no longer principally
oppose resource extraction, but to
merely expect to reciprocally
benefit from it. Any conservation
project intervention thus requires
effective cash-generating alternatives
to rival destructive resource use,
even if communities do understand
the long-term deleterious impact of
such practices. Genuine ecotourism, in no
small part, can make a difference here.